Przejdź do głównej zawartości


EVs won't save the planet. Ultimately, the material bill for billions of individual vehicles and the unavoidable geometry of more cars-more traffic-more roads-greater distances-more cars dictate that the future of our cities and planet requires public transit - *lots* of it.

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/26/unplanned-obsolescence/#better-micetraps

1/
A firebombed cityscape under a smoky red sky. In the foreground is a gigantic brick, most of the length of a city block, with a set of solar panels atop it.

Image:
臺灣古寫真上色 (modified)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raid_on_Kagi_City_1945.jpg

Grendelkhan (modified)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ground_mounted_solar_panels.gk.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

2 użytkowników udostępniło to dalej

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/2

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/3

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/4

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/5

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/6

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/7

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/8

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/9

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/10

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/11

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/12

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/13

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/14

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/15

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/16

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/17

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/18

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/19

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/20

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/21

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/22

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/23

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/24

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/25

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/26

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/27

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/28

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/29

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/30

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/31

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/32

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/33

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/34

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/35

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/36

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/37

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/38

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/39

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/40

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/41

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/42

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/33

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/14

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/12

Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/3

two unintended consequences of the move towards electric vehicles is that they are at their best on short journeys, not travelling transcontinental.
And they are also at their best at speeds under 40 miles an hour, becoming very greedy over 60.

Both of these factors will help modal shift to mass transit across longer distances and should help to reduce average traffic speeds.

Cory Doctorowudostępnił to.

@peterbrown

The US needs much more investment in rail before we can stop using cars, particularly in the Pacific Northwest, where train service is perfunctory at best. I really hoped this would be a major benefit of Biden in the White House.
@brianary @peterbrown Then weigh-in in favor of CA's HSR project when billionaire-owned papers like the NYT run hit-pieces or someone uses the word "boondoggle" to describe it (nobody uses "boondoggle". That word came down as a requirement in a memo because some rich-fogey thinks they know better).

Help us keep the air clear and get the HSR built and people like me will help by raising our voices when the CA project is complete to continue extending the rails north towards Seattle.
@peterbrown Almost all passenger vehicles become "very greedy" over 60, regardless of fuel type. EVs just put the power number conveniently on the dashboard so you can see it for yourself.
- perhaps bikes and especially e-bikes and e-scooters should be added to the list: bikes used to have easily interchangeable parts, now you may get a bike that is very hard or costly to repair, because it uses unique or rare parts. With e-bikes and e-scooters, as long as the electronics work, the problem is the battery and chargers. I could not find a battery that matched the dimensions and the electrical interface (location of pins) of my old one.

Cory Doctorowudostępnił to.

Capitalism's love of proprietary parts is a very big problem. Standardization can go a long way, and the EU has shown it's even possible to enforce such in our existing socioeconomic structure---just the other day I remember telling someone that our best bet hope for the e-bike space is that the EU drops a regulatory interoperability mandate for them like they did with USB-C for phones.
Back in the days when I was a burgeoning computer geek, I stayed away from Apple computers because of the proprietary software.

EV's and clean tech can gain consumer trust and even fortify themselves against collapse with interchangeable software and even parts.

The "Right to repair" bill was a step in the right direction. I hope, with some amendments, that it can be the basis for a more consumer friendly clean tech industry.
A great thread, full of truth.

It's why the US's recent climate and infrastructure bill, with the give-the-punchline-away title of the "Inflation Reduction Act" was so desperately disappointing. What America needed was a national public transport initiative; what they got was money given to the states peacemeal to do with as they pleased, which mostly meant "more highways for more cars".
No thanks, there are already plenty of anti-EV gaslighting articles published to choose from.