The Rights of Nature movement uses a bold tactic to preserve our habitable Earth: it seeks to extend (pseudo) personhood to things like watersheds, forests and other ecosystems, as well as nonhuman species, in hopes of creating legal "standing" to ask the courts for protection:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_of_nature
-
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/15/artificial-lifeforms/#moral-consideration
1/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_of_nature
-
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2026/04/15/artificial-lifeforms/#moral-consideration
1/
Luce
•Cory Doctorowudostępnił to.
Phosphenes
•Animal cruelty laws are another precedent for non-human representation.
How do you defend, or even detect, a river's self-determination? Maybe copy from child protection laws where the person is incapable of such?
Cory Doctorow
•Ostrzeżenie o treści: Long thread/2
2/